Keep Calm and Think Zebras

The Tempest was one of the first plays I read while taking a crash course on all things Shakespearean in college. Prospero is a commander of nymphs, an engineer of enchantments and a conjurer of magic that is exiled onto a tropical island, using his talents for his own needs whether they be for vengeance or protection. Taking the opportunity to seek retribution upon a ship carrying those that banished him, Prospero, through the aid of his nymph, turns a placid sea into a roaring storm, capsizing and shipwrecking all on board. The pace of the emergency room often seems determined in the same capricious manner.  One minute, the day’s moving at a snail’s pace with non-urgent patients meandering in with a sore throat or two and minor discomfort, taking time for granted, when without warning, we’re slammed with a wave of burst appendices, pulsatile aneurysms, and aches from every inch. The divide between calm and chaos can be a fickle one, gossamer at best, and while we’re all attempting to maneuver our own way through Prospero’s devices, it’s easy to underestimate the full force of tumultuous tides when you’re in the midst of tranquil waters.

Six weeks of psychiatry followed by six weeks of emergency medicine resulted in twelve weeks of two very different types of chaos. One was more of an inner turmoil while the other presented as an outward maelstrom, while both settings challenged me to maintain my own course. The ER served as our habitat for most of both rotations (three weeks of psychiatry consults), where we identified the patient, evaluated their relative level of distress, and tried to extract a thorough history of present illness. However, that’s where the paths diverged. In psychiatry, we were taught to chase the stories—any significant life changes occur recently?, what caused your relapse?, can you tell me about your childhood?— while emergency medicine coached us to chase the symptoms—where is the pain?, when did it start?, how would you characterize it? 

Nevertheless, both fields advised us on becoming oriented to being disoriented. Some 20 years of lecture experience were swept by the wayside as I entered my first rotation, before I could even register how to transmute everything I learned in the classroom to the clinical setting. You stand helplessly as each and every day your comfort dissipates like ether from your clasp, doing the best with what you know and what you do not. The true wonders of medicine can’t be appreciated when it’s your first day as an MS3 against the gaggle of interns, fellows, and attendings who swiftly seem to know it all and do it better. Continue reading

The Eye of the Beholder

We’re taught to forever believe that there is never a price too high for our sanity, as if being normal is a prize all on its own. For all its acclaim, what exactly is sanity? It has to be more than just being not insane. I like to believe that somewhere between sanity and insanity, there’s a place where the music isn’t jarring or somnolent, but just right; a push-and-pull collateral between gaudy and subtle, stringent and supple, rare and overdone. And while assessing the state of being sane is slightly more complex than preparing a steak (says the vegetarian…), our minds merely do not operate at two different levels but on a continuous spectrum. Six weeks of enduring the psych wards in one of the busiest hospitals on the east coast made me realize that stipulating normalcy is like trying to standardize what people see when taking a Rorschach test; what is orthodox to one is unorthodox to another. Thus, the act of defining often becomes futile in face of all the components that defy the very definition.

The psychiatry field has taught me, if nothing else, that normalcy, not just beauty, is in the eye of the beholder; often times a diagnosis can be more of a question than a statement as no two bipolar, suicidal, or schizophrenic patients are ever the same. What started off as a frustrating aspect of psychiatry actually turned into something I appreciated in the field, as it is not only more engaging for a diagnostician, but helps you understand the intrinsic diversity each patient showcases regardless of their blanket diagnosis.

Schizophrenia is not just Leonardo DiCaprio weaving a world of his own on Scorsese’s Shutter Island, it’s also the 20-year-old student that has no change in expression or movement, and sits silently in the corner. Depression is not just immeasurable grief for unknown reasons, it’s the woman who learns to subsist for the past two years but still carries on with her daily routine. Bipolar is not just Bradley Cooper dramatically substituting drugs for love in Silver Linings Playbook, it’s an individual that is trying to grasp onto some form of stability without grandiosity and theatricality. Continue reading

Mouth Shut. Mind Open.

It’s been my experience that the number one question that anyone even clandestinely thinking about medical school gets asked is “what kind of doctor do you want to be?” Not “why do you want to be a doctor?” or even “what area are you interested in?”  The person asking always wants specifics; other questions often fall to the wayside.  And generally, there’s always two types of physician hopefuls: The kind that brazenly state they have no idea and the kind that knew from birth what specialty and subspecialty they were going to choose after medical school. Being someone of the latter category who was hugely unaware of what a pretentious idiot I must’ve looked like as a twelve-year old telling people I was interested in cardiothoraic surgery, my answer to that question today has changed immensely. I’m merely a drifter; I wander whichever wind catches my sails first on any particular day. Continue reading